Work / Syzito

Syzito

EdTech prototype

Process-Aware Academic Writing Platform

Visit live site

Process-aware academic writing platform where students, teachers, and AI reason through the writing together, currently shipping as the Writey Thing prototype.

Syzito: reasoning together in academic writing

Process-aware academic writing platform where students, teachers, and AI reason through the writing together, not just at milestones and the final draft. Currently shipping as the Writey Thing prototype at writeything.benjaminloschen.com.

The name

Syzito comes from the Greek verb syzētō: syn (together) + zēteō (to seek, inquire). In classical usage it means "to examine together, discuss, investigate, reason together," not just casually talk. That's the product thesis: not producing a finished essay, but seeing and supporting the joint process of inquiry between student, teacher, and AI.

The problem it solves

Students hit blank-page pressure and can't see their own revision process
Teachers only see endpoints (the draft, the rubric, the grade) and miss where thinking actually happens (and where AI participation actually happens)
Traditional feedback disconnects from observable writing behavior, so interventions are guesses

What's unique

Process visibility over product focus: reason together through the entire writing process, not just at milestones and the final draft
Transparent AI participation: the system clearly shows where AI contributes to the shared inquiry, not as a black box
Evidence-linked interventions: every insight points back to visible writing behavior
Replayable history: teachers can review the evolution of student thinking chronologically, including typed-vs-pasted and AI-use signals

Product surface (prototype)

Student side:

Guided drafting with in-flow AI support
Revision replay showing idea evolution
Per-session reflection prompts
Assignment dashboard, student report view

Teacher side:

Triage dashboard with revision density, typed-vs-pasted ratio, AI-use indicators
Assignment setup flow with rubric-driven grading + Canvas integration
Session overview + session review with timeline markers
Evidence-linked summaries for intervention notes
Course assignments list, grading review/send modal

Tech stack

Next.js 16 (App Router) + React 19 + TypeScript + Tailwind v4
Radix UI + shadcn/ui for primitives; Tiptap 3 for the writing editor (with highlight, placeholder, underline extensions)
React Hook Form + Zod for forms and validation
Recharts for triage dashboards
Driver.js for guided tours of the student/teacher flows
Vercel Analytics for usage
Built as a v0 prototype, then taken into a full Next.js app with the design system extracted into a coherent component library

What I'd take to v1

The prototype validates the interaction model (process timeline, evidence-linked review, AI transparency) across both student and teacher flows. A production v1 would add: a real event-sourced data model (the Event Model Spec and Data Model Spec are written), a privacy / governance posture for student data (FERPA + AB-2273 considerations), Canvas/LMS integrations beyond the rubric stub, and an authorship-likelihood analysis surface (drafted in the feature docs).